Not entirely now that you mention it, but downsized well-enough with some notes as to who-and-who was cast. And of course you need references and footnotes. Maybe a SciFi channel press release, or one of the orginizations that track TV ratings might have the info. Also see if you see how many people watched it the night it was on. Most importantly the article needs a Production and critical reception sections. I agree with Dr.Who except you should not put a Trivia section in, those are unencyclopedic. Anything that's notable should be noted and a screenshot would be neat. And possibly critical reception if there is any. If there's director's or so-and-so's commentary thereon, that would prove useful for a Trivia section or for something concerning the Production aisle. Getting rid of the Cast segment should be done, I think, since we could always look it up on IMDb and alot of the actors don't seem as notable as others. Okay, expanding/improving the bit on the plot/ synopsis would be helpful.If you happen to actually have a DVD thereof, that would prolly be a tremendous help. But I think we could try proving that fact wrong with Wikipedia. Though, the main problem with all these films is that there's primarily not a whole lot of information on them, i.e. Even though I have my doubts of such like this attaining that, it's really worth the work to see one of these SciFi original movies.

TruthCrusader 15:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Hee, well. I believe with a lot of hard work, this article, about one of the worst films ever made, can blossom into a well written, peer reviewed masterpiece and one day achieve FA status. I am looking for pointers and advice for all areas on the entry page. Hence, I have chosen one of my favorite bad movies of all time to test my theory. I want to prove that any entry, even about the weirdest of subjects, can be graded as a GA and become an FA with the help and input of the Wikipedia community.

Boa vs python review